Bronchial Artery Embolization in Pediatric Pulmonary Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Experience

PurposeTo explore the safety and effectiveness of bronchial artery (BA) embolization (BAE) in children with pulmonary hemorrhage.Materials and MethodsBetween February 2016 and February 2019, 41 patients (median age, 4 y; interquartile range, 2.3-8 y; median weight, 17.6 kg; interquartile range, 12.3–23.6 kg) underwent BAE. The indication of BAE included massive hemoptysis in 10 patients (24.4%), recurrent hemoptysis in 18 patients (43.9%), and refractory anemia in 13 patients (31.7%). The main etiology of pulmonary hemorrhage included pulmonary hemosiderosis (58.5%), congenital heart disease (17.1%), and infection (14.6%). A retrospective review was conducted of clinical outcomes of BAE.ResultsThere were 44 embolization sessions, with a total of 137 embolized vessels. Pulmonary hemorrhage was caused by BAs in 30 cases, nonbronchial systemic arteries plus BAs in 10, and nonbronchial systemic arteries in 1. Embolic particles were used in 30 cases (24 polyvinyl alcohol [PVA] and 6 microsphere), coils in 9 cases, and particles plus coils in 5 cases (4 PVA and 1 microsphere). Technical success (ability to embolize abnormal vessel) was achieved in 97.6% of patients (40 of 41), and clinical success (complete or partial resolution of hemoptysis within 30 days of embolization) was achieved in 90.2% (37 of 41). There was 1 procedure-related complication (2.4%) of cerebral infarction and 1 death from multiple-organ dysfunction (2.4%). Bleeding-free survival rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 92.5%, 83.9%, 83.9%, and 70.8%, respectively.ConclusionsBAE is a safe and effective procedure in children with pulmonary hemorrhage.     

宣威地区与非宣威地区肺癌患者临床流行病学特征及病理类型特点分析

目的:分析宣威地区与非宣威地区的肺癌临床流行病学与病理特征。方法:以云南省肿瘤医院（昆明医科大学第三附属医院）2015年3月至2015年5月手术治疗的肺癌患者为研究对象，共295例，收集患者相关信息。将其分为宣威地区、非宣威地区进行统计。对患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析，包含病理类型、年龄、性别、吸烟史等。结果:宣威地区、非宣威地区肺癌患者男女比例为1.19∶1和1.69∶1。宣威地区患者平均年龄为［53.41±8.74(34~85)］岁，中位年龄53岁。非宣威地区肺癌患者平均年龄为［58.68±8.63(38~78)］岁，中位年龄59岁。宣威地区肺癌高发年龄为40~59岁段。宣威地区I期肺癌患者占比、T1期肺癌患者占比、N0期肺癌患者占比均高于非宣威地区。宣威地区男性腺癌鳞癌比远高于非宣威地区，差异有显著统计学意义。结论:宣威地区女性肺癌发病率更高，发病年龄更趋年轻化，腺癌比例高，吸烟与宣威地区男性腺癌高发关系不密切。     

Short- to medium-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass compared with one-anastomosis gastric bypass for weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BackgroundSingle-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) and the one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are 2 revisional procedures to address the problem of weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of SADI and OAGB as revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) in initially super-obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m²).SettingAcademic hospital, bariatric center of excellence, Germany.MethodsObservational study of outcomes in 84 initially super-obese patients who had undergone RBS after LSG (SADI n = 42, OAGB n = 42) between July 2013 and April 2018. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after RBS. The variables analyzed included time between LSG and RBS, BMI, excess weight loss, total weight loss, operation time, and complications.ResultsThe time interval between LSG and RBS was 45.5 ± 22.8 and 43.5 ± 24.2 months for SADI and OAGB, respectively. At the time of RBS, the mean BMI was 42.8 ± 7.9 kg/m² for SADI and 43.4 ± 9.2 kg/m² for OAGB. The follow-up examinations rates (%) after SADI were 97.6, 92.8, 90.5, 78.6, 57.1, and 100, 97.6, 95.2, 85.7, and 59.5 after OAGB. The BMI at the follow-up examinations were 39.1 ± 7.2, 34.2 ± 6.9, 31.2 ± 5.8, 30.2 ± 5.3, 29.3 ± 5.1 for SADI, and 39.5 ± 8.1, 36.6 ± 7.4, 34.7 ± 7.9, 32.9 ± 6.3, and 31.6 ± 5.9 for OAGB. The mean operating times for SADI and OAGB were 138 ± 40 and 123 ± 39 minutes, respectively. Three patients in the SADI group and 1 patient in the OAGB group developed a major complication within the first 30 postoperative days.ConclusionSADI and OAGB were effective second-step procedures for further weight reduction after LSG in initially super-obese patients after short to medium follow-up. There was a trend toward higher weight loss for SADI though this did not reach statistical significance. Substantial differences concerning surgery time and complications between the 2 procedures were not observed.     

Chest wall resection and reconstruction for recurrent breast cancer – A multidisciplinary approach

BackgroundDespite therapeutic advances in the management of breast cancer, a significant number of patients present with locoregional recurrence. Treatment with hormonal, chemo or radiotherapy remains standard in such cases. However, in selected patients of recurrent breast cancer involving chest wall, multidisciplinary surgical approach could be considered.MethodsBetween 2010 and 2018, 21 patients with recurrent breast cancer, involving chest wall, were treated at a tertiary care center with resection and reconstruction. The mean age of the patients was 55 years (22–77 years).ResultsThe median interval from first breast resection to chest wall resection (CWR) for recurrent disease was 6 years (1–24 years). Eighteen patients underwent bony resection and 3 patients required extensive soft tissue resection. Complete resection was achieved in 90% of patients. All patients had chest wall reconstruction. There was no in-hospital mortality. During follow-up, 8 patients died, of which 7 were due to distant metastases. The 1 year and 3-year overall survival were 90% (95% CI 66–97) and 61% (95% CI 31–81) respectively. The disease-free survival at 1 and 3 years was the same at 70% (95% CI 45–86). At a mean follow up of 23 months, the average survival in patients operated for local recurrence is 51.7 months (95% CI 37.7–65.7) and 24.5 months (95% CI 7.3–41.7) for patients with distant metastatic recurrence.ConclusionA multidisciplinary oncoplastic approach for recurrent breast cancer, which includes chest wall resection and reconstruction is a useful adjunct in selected group of patients. This improves local disease control, symptoms and possibly disease-free survival.     

以气促为主诉症状的焦虑症患者误诊为支气管哮喘临床分析

目的回顾性分析在我院就诊的41例以气促、气喘为主诉症状的焦虑症患者误诊为支气管哮喘的临床特点,分析误诊原因。方法所有患者均由呼吸专科医师在患者就诊时据患者的主诉、体征、支气管激发试验及患者对哮喘相关治疗的反应进行初步判断,填写哮喘控制测试(ACT)量表,再在心身科专科医师指导下行抑郁自评量表(SDS)及焦虑自评量表(SAS)填写,若诊断为焦虑障碍即予以心身专科抗焦虑治疗。追踪随访3个月以上,对患者治疗前后症状、SDS、SAS、ACT评分进行相关分析。结果 41例患者中女性占绝对多数(95%),进行心身科专科治疗后患者气促等临床症状得到明显改善,ACT、SDS、SAS评分均较治疗前明显改善(P0.05)。最长随访为12月,部分患者虽有气促、胸闷症状的反复发作,但在心身科调整治疗后症状能较快改善及缓解。在未进行哮喘治疗的情况下无一例因哮喘发作入院及死亡。结论以气促为主诉症状的焦虑症患者易误诊为哮喘,女性尤为突出。合理运用ACT、SDS、SAS等评分可以降低临床误诊率。